Why inductive approach

The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57 , —; Pate, A.

Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade county spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57 , —; Sherman, L. Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence.

American Sociological Review, 57 , — Results from these follow-up studies were mixed. In some cases, arrest deterred future incidents of violence. In other cases, it did not. This left the researchers with new data that they needed to explain.

The researchers therefore took an inductive approach in an effort to make sense of their latest empirical observations.

The new studies revealed that arrest seemed to have a deterrent effect for those who were married and employed but that it led to increased offenses for those who were unmarried and unemployed. Researchers thus turned to control theory, which predicts that having some stake in conformity through the social ties provided by marriage and employment, as the better explanation. What the Sherman and Berk research, along with the follow-up studies, shows us is that we might start with a deductive approach to research, but then, if confronted by new data that we must make sense of, we may move to an inductive approach.

Do the townspeople take an inductive or deductive approach to determine whether the woman in question is a witch? What are some of the different sources of knowledge recall Chapter 1 "Introduction" they rely on? Previous Section. Table of Contents. Next Section. Two Different Approaches Learning Objectives Describe the inductive approach to research, and provide examples of inductive research. Describe the deductive approach to research, and provide examples of deductive research.

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here. To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:. Other access options You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile.

Rent this content from DeepDyve. Rent from DeepDyve. If you think you should have access to this content, click to contact our support team.

I reckon I have to face the facts. Generally, the application of inductive approach is associated with qualitative methods of data collection and data analysis, whereas deductive approach is perceived to be related to quantitative methods.

The following table illustrates such a classification from a broad perspective:. Concepts associated with quantitative methods Concepts associated with qualitative methods Type of reasoning Deduction. Meaning Type of question Pre-specified. A third coin from the bag is a penny. Therefore, all the coins in the bag are pennies. Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false. Here's an example: "Harold is a grandfather.

Therefore, all grandfathers are bald. Inductive reasoning has its place in the scientific method. Scientists use it to form hypotheses and theories. Deductive reasoning allows them to apply the theories to specific situations.

Another form of scientific reasoning that doesn't fit in with inductive or deductive reasoning is abductive. Abductive reasoning usually starts with an incomplete set of observations and proceeds to the likeliest possible explanation for the group of observations, according to Butte College.

It is based on making and testing hypotheses using the best information available. It often entails making an educated guess after observing a phenomenon for which there is no clear explanation.